RHCP Antennas vs. Linear-Polarized: GPS Insights from Measured Data
- Vincent

- 3 days ago
- 3 min read

In MIOT’s ongoing GNSS hardware programs—including asset trackers, industrial sensing nodes, fleet/telematics devices, and smart IoT terminals—we have conducted extensive testing on antenna polarization, board placement, and overall RF performance. The choice of antenna has a significant impact on cold-start acquisition, signal stability, and positioning accuracy.
Linear Polarization vs. 25×25 mm Ceramic RHCP
Linear-Polarized GPS Antenna
Linear-polarized antennas are compact and cost-efficient, but the polarization mismatch against GPS satellites (which transmit RHCP signals) results in:
3–6 dB polarization loss
Cold-start TTFF around 50–60 seconds
Lower signal strength (C/N₀), more unstable tracking
Weaker performance in vehicles, city canyon, and indoor, near-window environments
Higher sensitivity to multi-path reflections
This option is typically used for ultra-low-cost tracking but does not meet MIOT’s industrial-grade accuracy requirements.
25×25 mm Ceramic RHCP GPS Antenna
A 25×25 mm ceramic patch antenna provides a strong match to satellite RHCP polarization. MIOT’s tests show:
Cold-start TTFF: 30–35 seconds
4–8 dB higher C/N₀ signal strength
Much faster position convergence
Better multi-path resistance
More consistent accuracy across field scenarios
Suitable for industrial, automotive, and high-performance IoT devices
This is MIOT’s recommended antenna option for all performance-sensitive GNSS applications.
Recommended GPS Antenna Scheme for Current Projects
Based on MIOT’s experience and customer requirements, we recommend the following approach for devices requiring stable GNSS performance:
✔ Recommended Option (MIOT Standard)
25×25 mm Ceramic RHCP antenna + GNSS LNA + well-isolated ground plane
Delivers the highest GPS signal integrity
Ensures robust performance in North American fleet and industrial environments
Supports multi-GNSS (GPS / GLONASS / Galileo / BeiDou) without redesign
Matches MIOT’s modular RF designs for future scalability
✔ Optional Compact Solution
18×18 mm or 20×20 mm Ceramic RHCP patch: For smaller enclosures, while keeping much better performance than linear antennas.
✘ Not Recommended for MIOT Industrial Devices
Wire/linear GNSS antenna, unless size or cost constraints dominate. Performance loss is significant and may not meet customer accuracy targets.
Hardware Layout and Antenna Placement Guidelines
To maximize GPS performance, MIOT’s RF and PCB teams follow several key principles:
Ground Plane Requirements
Minimum recommended ground plane for 25×25 mm patch: 35×35 mm or larger
Larger ground planes improve C/N₀ and tracking stability
Keep the antenna centered on the ground plane when possible
Antenna Placement
Position the patch at the top of the enclosure, facing the sky
Avoid placement near: (1)High-speed digital lines; (2) Switching power regulators; (3) LTE/5G antennas; (4) Metal shielding cans
Maintain at least 10–15 mm clearance from other antennas (LTE/WiFi/BLE)
RF Routing
Use a 50 Ω controlled impedance trace from antenna → LNA → GNSS module
Keep the GNSS feedline as short as possible (< 30 mm recommended)
Avoid sharp bends; if needed, use 45° bends or arc traces
Do not route under noise-heavy components such as DC-DC converters
Power & Noise Isolation
GNSS LNA and module require clean, low-noise power
Add: (1) π-filter at supply input; (2) Separate LDO from noisy 3.3 V rails; (3) Ground stitching vias around RF zone
Enclosure Considerations
Plastic housing preferred
If a metal housing is required: (1)Provide an RF window or a non-metal area above the antenna; (2) Avoid placing screws or standoffs directly over the patch
Conclusion
MIOT’s testing confirms that GNSS performance is driven primarily by antenna choice and RF design. Ceramic RHCP patch antennas—especially 25×25 mm—significantly outperform linear antennas in TTFF, signal strength, and positioning stability. For industrial and automotive IoT devices, MIOT recommends ceramic RHCP antennas with a proper ground plane and RF layout to ensure reliable, accurate, and scalable GNSS performance.










